House resolution 31 is a resolution assigning a day for national Internet and electronic safety day.
What in the world is with this damn government, do they not have better issues to deal with than something like this. Everyone in America is more than aware of the risks of Internet and electronic dangers and should be able to observe and give their attention to this issue without our government wasting their time discussing it and designating a day of National Attention, when they should be dealing with issues such as the failing economy, the wasted money they are giving to big corporations and such that are pissing it away buying more jets, failing banks and so on. The corporation of Citibank is now asking for more money after they pissed away the first government bail out. My understanding of the use of bail out money to banks was to help the banks with debt and to get them back to lending money to consumers, HA. All they seem to be using it for is to buy out more banks and more company jets. They are supposed to be using it to start lending money again but the working class American still can't borrow money, what the heck is this crap, get real man. They are begging the government for our hard earned tax money to save them, but when we need money (our money) to save us, the answer is a big fat NO, and we are told we are not a good financial loan risk. Look, who's money is it that bail them (the banks) out. Why is it that they are failing but not considered to risky to be given our money, but we the individual American people are too much of a risk to borrow it from them ? Damn it, it is our money. Let them go broke, save our money, give it back to the American people where it will make a difference. Our government are idiots.
WHAT ARE THEY THINKING
Monday, January 26, 2009
Saturday, January 17, 2009
Stimulas Package
I was watching the news today and they are saying that with the stimulus package the money involved that the government is planning to hand out to all the big companies to try to stimulate the economy they could give out $2700 to every individual in the US, that is how far that amount money would go. In doing this in my opinion would make much more sense and would do more to stimulate the economy because it is the individual in America that is going to spend the money on things that would actually stimulate the economy and help businesses also.
But on the other hand it would make more sense I believe if you are going to hand out the money to the individuals, then you should cut out the rich and all of the people that do not work and collect welfare beings all of the welfare recipients are getting their money for free anyway. The reason for cutting out the money for the rich in my opinion, they do not need the money anyway and the money that they spend, they are going to spend anyway, so why give them more free money. But, if you give out the money to the middle income and the low income, that will actually give them cash in their pockets that they are more than likely going to go out and spend. Granted some of this money that they receive will go to pay house payments and bills that they are either behind on or struggling to pay, leaving the rest of the money to go out and spend at businesses which in return would help to stimulate the economy. So, if every individual in America would receive $2700 out of all of the money that the government is going to use to stimulate the economy, but take away giving it to the rich and giving it to the people on welfare, then that would allow a bigger amount of money to the working-class people. Which could possibly boost the amount of $2700 to each individual to an increase of possibly double or triple. Now that would give the working-class plenty of money to catch up all their bills and a late payments and give them plenty of extra money to go out and spend.
Now that is what I call a stimulus package that would actually do some good and benefit the people and the economy.
But on the other hand it would make more sense I believe if you are going to hand out the money to the individuals, then you should cut out the rich and all of the people that do not work and collect welfare beings all of the welfare recipients are getting their money for free anyway. The reason for cutting out the money for the rich in my opinion, they do not need the money anyway and the money that they spend, they are going to spend anyway, so why give them more free money. But, if you give out the money to the middle income and the low income, that will actually give them cash in their pockets that they are more than likely going to go out and spend. Granted some of this money that they receive will go to pay house payments and bills that they are either behind on or struggling to pay, leaving the rest of the money to go out and spend at businesses which in return would help to stimulate the economy. So, if every individual in America would receive $2700 out of all of the money that the government is going to use to stimulate the economy, but take away giving it to the rich and giving it to the people on welfare, then that would allow a bigger amount of money to the working-class people. Which could possibly boost the amount of $2700 to each individual to an increase of possibly double or triple. Now that would give the working-class plenty of money to catch up all their bills and a late payments and give them plenty of extra money to go out and spend.
Now that is what I call a stimulus package that would actually do some good and benefit the people and the economy.
W.A.T.T.
We are creating a new page to our BOF-L.com website. It will be called W.A.T.T. short for "what are they thinking".
It will be a list of stupid things that our government and also everyday people do and say.
So, open your eyes and ears to the world and send us your WATT to add to our page.
Send to: watt@bof-l.com or at usabofl@gmail.com or leave your WATT on our comments below
It will be a list of stupid things that our government and also everyday people do and say.
So, open your eyes and ears to the world and send us your WATT to add to our page.
Send to: watt@bof-l.com or at usabofl@gmail.com or leave your WATT on our comments below
Saturday, January 10, 2009
A Little Gun History
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control:
56 million. It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in: List of 7 items: Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)! In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns! While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed. There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.
You won't see this data n the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson. With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'. If you value your freedom, Please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends. The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
I am a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment ! YOU SHOULD BE TOO !!
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control:
56 million. It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in: List of 7 items: Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)! In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns! While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed. There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.
You won't see this data n the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson. With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'. If you value your freedom, Please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends. The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
I am a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment ! YOU SHOULD BE TOO !!
Saturday, January 3, 2009
War in Gaza
I was reading an article from the International Herold Tribune and there was this paragraph :
"Hanef said that Mubarak is a good man who has kept Egypt at peace, 'but he is not doing all he can.' There is not enough pressure on Israel and Washington, he said, and he thought that the demonstrations in Cairo should continue."
And I wonder why it is that all of these middle east countries hate the United States so much and condemn us for everything, but when war or disagreements brake out over there, all they seem to do is beg for help from us, the "United States". All of those sand goons over there hate Americans so bad and don't want us there but when they need help they come crying to us. That is what I call hipocrites and that is the one thing in this world that I can not stand. Get a life people, make a choice a stick by it. Either you hate America and Americans or you don't, make up your minds. Don't say you hate us and then cry to us for help ! Also don't condemn us and what we stand for and then want to come and live in our country. Don't come to America and then try to change our way of life and expect us to cater to you.
If you are coming here, Pledge Allegiance to our Flag and Country or get the hell back in your own and stay there.
They have been fighting over there since the beginning of time and mostly over land and religion. Shouldn't everyone in the world have the right to believe in whatever religion they want, without someone else telling them it is right or wrong. I mean in the end we are all going to die and God will be the one to sort it all out, so why can't people just live there own lives the way they believe. Everyone in the world is entitled to believe in what they want to and it is not hurting anyone else.
"Hanef said that Mubarak is a good man who has kept Egypt at peace, 'but he is not doing all he can.' There is not enough pressure on Israel and Washington, he said, and he thought that the demonstrations in Cairo should continue."
And I wonder why it is that all of these middle east countries hate the United States so much and condemn us for everything, but when war or disagreements brake out over there, all they seem to do is beg for help from us, the "United States". All of those sand goons over there hate Americans so bad and don't want us there but when they need help they come crying to us. That is what I call hipocrites and that is the one thing in this world that I can not stand. Get a life people, make a choice a stick by it. Either you hate America and Americans or you don't, make up your minds. Don't say you hate us and then cry to us for help ! Also don't condemn us and what we stand for and then want to come and live in our country. Don't come to America and then try to change our way of life and expect us to cater to you.
If you are coming here, Pledge Allegiance to our Flag and Country or get the hell back in your own and stay there.
They have been fighting over there since the beginning of time and mostly over land and religion. Shouldn't everyone in the world have the right to believe in whatever religion they want, without someone else telling them it is right or wrong. I mean in the end we are all going to die and God will be the one to sort it all out, so why can't people just live there own lives the way they believe. Everyone in the world is entitled to believe in what they want to and it is not hurting anyone else.
Friday, January 2, 2009
Airlines and Terrorist
You know I was watching the news and they are talking about an Indian family being taken off of an airplane. With the way the terrorist activity is these days and has been in the past I really don't see what the big deal is after all, the airline was just looking out for the rest of the passengers. I mean can they really take a chance considering everything that is going on in the world now and how everyone seems to hate the people in the West. I think for safety reasons that the airline company did the right thing, Why would anybody want to take that risk and not at least check into it. I do in one way feel sorry for the family and what they had to go through but I also think that the airline did the right thing. And at least when it was all over they did help them find other flights and also reimburse them for their tickets and paid for the tickets of the new flights that they had to take. I am very sure that it was very embarrassing to the family but they also have to understand that the airline was just looking out for the safety of the other passengers and not willing to take a risk. I guess what you have to do is consider that, what if the airlines wouldn't of checked into these people and they would have been terrorist, once the airplane was in the air and then they realized they had terrorist onboard then what could they have possibly done. Is it really worth putting lives of hundreds of people at risk just to avoid embarrassing and few individuals. I know myself that if I was on that plane and there was any question in my mind or anyone else's, that I would expect the airline company to do exactly the same thing, wouldn't you? After all, doesn't everybody in America remember what happened on 9/11.
Or have they already forgotten, I know I have not.
Or have they already forgotten, I know I have not.
Obama
I wonder how long it will take for the American people to start looking down on Obama the way they look down on Bush. I really hope that Obama can do what he is setting out to do but, when congress starts injecting pork into all of the bills what will Obama do.
If he veto's a bill because of all the pork then the congress will convince the people that he doesn't care about the people and the congress looks good again. When are the American people going to open their eyes and figure out that the congress are the screw ups.
When Clinton was in office he did one of the best things that could ever have been done and that was the line item veto. This stopped all of the pork, it allowed all of the things that was good for the people to be passed for what it was.
Open your eyes people, put the blame where it should really go, on the screw up congress.
WHAT ARE YOU THINKING ?
If he veto's a bill because of all the pork then the congress will convince the people that he doesn't care about the people and the congress looks good again. When are the American people going to open their eyes and figure out that the congress are the screw ups.
When Clinton was in office he did one of the best things that could ever have been done and that was the line item veto. This stopped all of the pork, it allowed all of the things that was good for the people to be passed for what it was.
Open your eyes people, put the blame where it should really go, on the screw up congress.
WHAT ARE YOU THINKING ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
